Roel Bogie
Impact of endoscopist training on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer rate
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11
Case
Age, gender
79, F 74, F 79, M 80, M 85, F 76, F 76, M 84, F 75, M 80, M 57, F
Indication (index exam)
Sympt
Surv Surv Surv
Sympt
Surv Surv
Sympt Sympt
Surv
Sympt
Time T0-CRC (months)
52
6
56
22
28
51
44
24
15
48
44
Location
Prox
Prox
Dist
Dist
Prox
Prox
Prox
Dist
Dist
Prox
Dist
DD
Comorbidity
DD
DD DD DD DD DD
C-V
DD
C-V
T3 N0M0
T3 N0M1
T2 N0M0
T3 N0M0
T4 N0M0
T3 N0M0
T4 N0M0
T1 N0M0
T1 N0M0
T3 N0M0
Tx N0M1
Tumor Stage
New cancer
Missed lesion
Surveil lance
Missed lesion
Missed lesion
New cancer
Inadeq. exam.
Inadeq. exam.
Surveil lance
Missed lesion
Missed lesion
Likely etiology
Figure 9.4: Clinical characteristics of the patients with a PCCRC from 2008-2012. Sympt = symptoms, Surv = surveillance, Prox = proximal colon, Dist = distal colon, DD = diverticular disease, C-V = cardiovascular disease, Surveillance = nonadherence to surveillance interval, Inadeq exam = inadequate bowel examination.
9
179
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online